« men do make passes at men with fat asses | Main | review: red hot + blue »
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I don't get this whole fixation with foreskins. Spare me the ridiculous arguments of 'naturalness'. Cut and be damned!
Posted by: Gunn | May 14, 2006 at 01:03 PM
the circumcision of a baby boy is mutilation - he has no say in the matter. once it's gone, it's gone. let him decide when he's older.
Posted by: H | May 16, 2006 at 09:48 AM
When he's older, it will hurt even worse! A baby boy doesn't even remember the pain. I know I don't, but if I had had it done as an older child or adult, you better be damn sure I would remember it.
That shit hurts!
Posted by: AntBee | May 23, 2006 at 10:32 AM
Circumcision is no more mutilation than cutting the umbilical cord.
There ain't nothing like a clean circumsized cock!!
Posted by: george86 | August 06, 2006 at 02:18 PM
im a glad i have the decision now, i wouldnt give it up, and there is nothing wrong with either way cut or uncut, but i prefer uncut
Posted by: kyle | April 14, 2007 at 11:53 PM
I am uncut and proud of it, it is mutilation if done without consent. I like the look of a cut cock though, but a cock is a cock is a cock, nothing more.
Posted by: Evil Danger | June 24, 2007 at 09:06 AM
A hospital in Canada did research on the memory aspect and babies do remember just not on the way you think. Those circumcised at birth tend to have a lower tolerance to pain and subconsciencely do remember the correlation between doctor and a bad experience.
Also the embilicol cord is not full of nerves and sensors. The forskin is.
Foreskin is made not only for the pleasure of the man but for the woman also.
No artificial lubricants required when making love.
There is nothing wrong with Circumcision if it is medically necessary and the person to whom the penis belongs is aware of the situaton and makes thier own decission.
Babies can not be given useful pain relief but adults can have the area frozen and feel almost no pain.
Adults dont crap or pee in their diapers exposing an open wound to infections
and adults are more able to tell a doctor when something doesn't feel right or is wrong.
According to Medical LAW it is Illegal for a doctor to remove a piece of the body unless it is damaged or not functioning properly.
This has opened up MANY law suits that have been sucessful in suing doctors and parents in many States in the USA and provinces in Canada over the past few years.
Is it right or wrong? When you are old enough to pay for the operation out of your own pocket you will be old enough to make the decision for yourself.
Posted by: | July 27, 2007 at 07:53 PM
All I can say is, I was circumcised not as a baby but as an 8 year old boy. I'm not exactly sure how the decision came about but I do remember it being one of the most painful experiences in my life. If given the decision now, I would opt out of being circumcised.
Posted by: angry cut dude | March 22, 2011 at 10:38 AM